Jump to Navigation
18 Years of Focused Experience in Taxation

What can a tax attorney argue to attempt to stop the progression of a criminal case at the District Counsel review level of the IRS or at the Department of Justice level?

BBB Accredited Business

Every CID recommendation to prosecute taxpayers for a Tax Crime are reviewed by District Counsel attorneys. An opportunity therefore exists for a Taxpayer's representative to present defenses at a requested District Counsel conference. The reality is that District Counsel must be satisfied that evidence gathered by CID is sufficient to establish that a tax crime was committed and that reasonable probability of conviction exists. District Counsel is faced with two choices, decline to prosecute or return a particular case for additional investigation by CID. It is to be noted however that once a case is worked up and presented for review by District Counsel, Few cases are in fact declined.

If IRS District Counsel determines that prosecution is warranted or that grand jury investigation should take place, the case is referred to the Department of Justice. This referral takes place via a letter referred to as a Criminal Reference Letter (CRL), which sets forth the recommendation of District Counsel for prosecution, the evidence supporting the recommendation, details concerning the technical aspects of the case, and an assessment of possible prosecution problems. The CID special agent's report and exhibits are also enclosed. A copy of the CRL is sent to the appropriate U.S. Attorney within the Department of Justice with instructions to charge specific crimes against the taxpayer and designating one or more major counts which may premise a plea agreement. Referral to the Department of Justice terminates the IRS's authority to issue or enforce any further summonses to investigate the Criminal Tax matter. Declination, or refusal to take the case, by the Department of Justice restores the IRS's authority to use administrative process. Cases that meet all the other requirements for prosecution may nevertheless be declined by the Justice Department simply because their trial attorneys are of the opinion that no jury would convict due to a combination of circumstances, such as the taxpayer's age and health, the fact that the taxpayer has already suffered enough, or other circumstances likely to evoke jury sympathy. Defenses based on the lack of probability of conviction are of greatest value when conferring with the Department of Justice's trial attorneys.

Contact an Irvine Criminal Tax Attorney

Contact me, an Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles County and Westwood criminal tax audit lawyer, to schedule your reduced rate initial consultation today.

Back to Criminal Tax Representation FAQs

Firm Overview | David Klasing

Firm Overview | David Klasing

  • Contact my office to schedule your reduced rate initial consultation to learn how I can assist with your individual tax law concerns.
Search

Email Your Questions

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Skype Me!

Locations

Irvine Office

Irvine Office:

Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing
2372 Morse Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614

Telephone: 714-908-4467
Fax: 949-681-3504

Irvine Law Office

Westwood Office

Los Angeles Office:

Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing
10940 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1600
Los Angeles, CA 90024

Telephone: 310-492-5583
Fax: 310-496-1963

Los Angeles Law Office